THE CONSCIENCE’S LENS ON ETHICAL DECISION MAKING IN A PLURALISTIC SOCIETY
Downloads
Objective: This paper explores the role of conscience as a central lens through which individuals navigate moral dilemmas in such a complex environment (Pluralistic society) and also the study highlights how conscience enables individuals to remain authentic to their values while engaging empathetically with others. Method: The paper used carefully reading as source of information and secondary data guided by the research theory of “W.D. Ross’s theory of prima facie duties” as a suitable guide in decision making in a pluralistic society where there are different beliefs, views, perceptions, ideologies, and culture. Results: It has been found that decision making based on utility, deontological (duty-based decisions), and teleological (end results-based decisions) does not foster ethical decisions that are both personally authentic and socially inclusive. Novelty: The study concludes that conscience should be treated as a vital, context-sensitive guide that grounds personal integrity while remaining open to public critique. Also, the study recommends that individuals must cultivate reflective conscience through moral education, exposure to diverse perspectives, and practices of humility and accountability for ethical decisions in a pluralistic society.
R. Audi, Moral Value and Human Diversity. Oxford University Press, 2007.
R. R. Cottone and R. E. Claus, “Ethical decision-making models: A review of the literature,” J. Couns. & Dev., vol. 78, no. 3, pp. 275–283, 2000.
G. C. Banks, D. J. Knapp, L. Lin, C. S. Sanders, and J. A. Grand, “Ethical decision making in the 21st century: A useful framework for industrial-organizational psychologists,” Ind. Organ. Psychol., vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 220–235, 2022.
J. Stout, Democracy and Tradition. Princeton University Press, 2004.
F. Acker, “New findings on unconscious versus conscious thought in decision making: Additional empirical data and meta-analysis,” Judgm. Decis. Mak., vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 292–303, 2008.
G. Lindsay, “Ethical decision making,” in The Oxford Handbook of International Psychological Ethics, M. M. Leach, M. J. Stevens, G. Lindsay, A. Ferrero, and Y. Korkut, Eds., Oxford University Press, 2012, pp. 74–89.
T. L. Beauchamp and J. F. Childress, Principles of Biomedical Ethics, 8th ed. Oxford University Press, 2019.
S. Knapp, M. C. Gottlieb, and M. M. Handelsman, Ethical Dilemmas in Psychotherapy: Positive Approaches to Decision Making. American Psychological Association, 2015.
J. E. Barnett, Navigating the maze: Ethical decision-making in complex situations. 2002.
W. D. Ross, The Right and the Good. Oxford University Press, 1930.
M. Abadie and L. Waroquier, “Evaluating the benefits of conscious and unconscious thought in complex decision making,” Policy Insights from Behav. Brain Sci., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 72–78, 2019.
J. R. Rest, D. Narvaez, M. J. Bebeau, and S. J. Thoma, Postconventional Moral Thinking: A Neo-Kohlbergian Approach. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1999.
J. Hardy, C. R. Hall, and L. Hardy, “Quantifying athlete self-talk,” J. Sports Sci., vol. 23, no. 9, pp. 905–917, 2005.
T. Aquinas, Summa Theologica. Benziger Bros., 1947.
J. Ratzinger, On Conscience. Ignatius Press, 2007.
J. P. Wogaman, Moral Decision Making: A Guide to Personal Integrity and Social Conscience. Westminster John Knox Press, 2011.
C. B. Fisher, Decoding the Ethics Code: A Practical Guide for Psychologists, 4th ed. Sage Publications, 2017.
A. MacIntyre, After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory, 2nd ed. University of Notre Dame Press, 1984.
E. Mwakasege, “The role of consciousness and emotion in decision-making: A neuro philosophical perspective,” J. Neuro Philos., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1–15, 2020.
T. L. Jacobs, “The erring conscience: Aquinas on freedom of conscience in pluralistic society,” in Philosophy and Humanities Conference, Houston Community College, 2017.
D. Westberg, Right Practical Reason: Aristotle, Action, and Prudence in Aquinas. Oxford University Press, 1994.
A. Morin, “Possible links between self-awareness and inner speech: Theoretical background, underlying mechanisms, and empirical evidence,” J. Conscious. Stud., vol. 12, no. 4–5, pp. 115–134, 2005.
D. Hollenbach, The Common Good and Christian Ethics. Cambridge University Press, 2002.
Copyright (c) 2025 Prospa Msogoya
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
